2010-01-12
Disney’s KeyChest: Making DRM bearable
What is one of the biggest advantages of digital video? Distributing it is cheap and simple, it is always just an internet download away. Well, from the standpoint of the video industry, that is also its biggest disadvantage. Because pirating content is simpler, getting paid for it is also becoming more difficult. Thus, while it can be considered an impediment to technical progress, video DRM won’t go away as long as the industry considers it vital for its survival. The main hassle for consumers is that there are many competing DRM standards: Flash video DRM, Windows Media DRM, iTunes video DRM, etc. Thus, if you have rented a video on one device, say, your desktop computer, then that does not mean you’ll be able to play it on another device, say, you mobile phone.
Disney’s KeyChest is a proposal that might make DRM more bearable for consumers: A central agency registers the digital videos one owns or has rented. Ownership and/or rental rights are then enabled for all participating DRM systems. This is a conceptual shift from ownership to access rights and opens up all kinds of possibilities: Buy a Blu-ray Disc, then download a file for your mobile video player; have all your videos stored on the Internet and stream them to your computer to watch them; etc.
Short-term, KeyChest is a good idea. Long-term, we hopefully won’t need it. Whether or not DRM goes away also depends on how the audio industry fares with its decision to make all audio content DRM-free. In a perfect future, we will all be able to freely share content while the people who created it get compensated adequately.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Server-side storage of access rights is in general not a good idea: Something or other happens to the company, the server gets shut down, you lose all your rights. It has happened before and it will happen again.
Furthermore, I believe duplication is a good thing with regards to knowledge and the arts. That way, human output is less likely to vanish due to greediness/bankrupcies/stupidity and therefore will be still around for future generations.
I agree. KeyChest should (at least in theory) help with both: While you would still have rights that are owned by a third party, having a big consortium know that you own something is a little safer that just a single company knowing about it.
If one participating company streams and another one lets you download a file, then with KeyChest, you will be able to do both (at least that's how I understand it).
Post a Comment